Ex Parte Flick - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1830                                                         
          Application No. 09/583,257                                                   


               The disclosed invention relates to a controller in a vehicle            
          control system that stores a set of device codes for a plurality of          
          different vehicles.                                                          
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads          
          as follows:                                                                  
               1. A control system for a vehicle comprising a data                     
          communications bus and at least one vehicle device connected                 
          thereto, the control system comprising:                                      
               a transmitter and a receiver for receiving signals from said            
          transmitter; and                                                             
               a multi-vehicle compatible controller cooperating with said             
          transmitter and said receiver and for storing a set of device codes          
          for a given vehicle device for a plurality of different vehicles,            
          for reading a device code from the data communications bus, and for          
          determining a match between a read device code and the stored                
          device codes to thereby provide compatibility with a plurality of            
          different vehicles.                                                          
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                           
          Grossheim et al. (Grossheim) 4,794,368        Dec.  27, 1988                 
          Dery et al. (Dery)            5,673,017       Sept. 30, 1997                 
          Simms et al. (Simms)          5,808,564       Sept. 15, 1998                 
               Claims 1 through 8, 11, 16 through 26, 32 through 38 and 40             
          through 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                  
          anticipated by Dery.                                                         
               Claims 12, 14 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Dery in view of Simms.                            



                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007