The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RAJAT MUKHERJEE, DANIEL MANUEL DIAS and HIDAYATULLAH HABEEBULLAH SHAIKH ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1922 Application No. 09/163,724 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 8, 10, 11 and 14 through 24. The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for determining which of a web server computer or a client computer accessing the web server computer will process web site data to produce a formatted data product.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007