Appeal No. 2002-1922 Application No. 09/163,724 Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A computer system including at least one client computer having a processing capability and communicating one or more data requests to at least one web server of a web site, the web server having access to server data, comprising: logic means for selectively causing server data to be processed at the client computer or at the web site, based at least in part on the processing capability of the client computer, the processing of the server data rendering a formatted data structure; and logic means for causing the server data to be processed at the web site when a data request from the client computer indicates that the web server is to process server data to render a formatted data structure, regardless of the processing capability of the client computer. The references relied on by the examiner are: Tso et al. (Tso) 6,185,625 Feb. 6, 2001 (filed Dec. 20, 1996) Purcell 6,233,584 May 15, 2001 (filed Sept. 9, 1997) Claims 1 through 8, 10, 11 and 14 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Tso in view of Purcell. Reference is made to the supplemental brief (paper number 12), the answer (paper number 13) and the reply brief (paper number 14) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007