THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte MICHAEL M. TSO
Appeal No. 2002-2013
Application 09/036,6991
ON BRIEF
Before LEE, LANE and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of
appellant’s claims 9, 11-17, 22-26 and 29. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Barrett et al. (“Barrett”) 5,727,129 March 10, 1998
Hirai et al. (“Hirai”) 5,974,371 October 26, 1999
1 Application for patent filed March 6, 1998. The real party in interest is Intel Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007