Appeal No. 2002-2034
Application No. 09/175,080
claims 8-14 will stand or fall together, and claims 15-25 will
stand or fall together. Consistent with this indication, the
appellant has made no separate arguments with respect to the
remaining claims.
Accordingly, the dependent claims will stand or fall together
with their independent claims, and we will select claims 1, 8, and
15, the independent claims as representative of all of the claims
on appeal. See 37 CFR 1.192(c)(7). Note also In re Dance, 160
F.3d 1339, 1340 n.2, 48 USPQ2d 1635, 1636 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In
re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 1325, 231 USPQ 136, 137 (Fed. Cir. 1986);
In re Sernaker, 702 F.2d 989, 991, 217 USPQ 1, 3 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
Claim 1, 8, and 15 read as follows:
1. An image information transmitting method in a facsimile
machine, comprising the steps of:
pre-programming a dialing group of predetermined destinations
in said facsimile machine;
storing said pre-programmed dialing group of predetermined
destinations in said facsimile machine;
detecting the presence of a document in said facsimile
machine;
automatically selecting switches for accessing said pre-
programmed dialing group of predetermined destinations;
automatically selecting a switch for manually entering an
additional destination desired by said user;
automatically releasing said switches for accessing said pre-
programmed dialing group of predetermined destinations;
entering said additional destination desired by said user;
following said step of entering said additional destination,
automatically transmitting image information from said document to
each of said predetermined destinations of said pre-programmed
dialing group; and
transmitting said image information from said document to
said additional destination desired by said user.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007