Appeal No. 2002-2034 Application No. 09/175,080 “following” or where the context of the claim makes it a necessity. For claim 1, it is required that “image information” be “automatically transmitted” to “each of said predetermined destinations” and “said additional destination” “following said step of entering said additional destination.” We therefore agree with the appellant that the image information transfer must occur to all of the destinations “each” after the entry of the pre- programmed dialing group and an additional destination, at least for claim 1. The question raised for review, presented squarely, is whether the following passage (column 3, line 65 - column 4, line 10) anticipates the transmission order parameters of the claim: FIG. 2 is a plan view of the operation panel 35 in FIG. 1. In the diagram, the operation panel comprises a ten-key group 40 for entering [the] telephone number or the like of a destination, a display portion 41 for displaying instructions of operation procedure, destination telephone number or the like, a transmission key 42 for giving an instruction of transmission start after an original is set or destinations are specified, an interruption key 43 for giving an instruction of additional destinations for the broadcast transmission, a broadcast transmission key 44 for effecting a broadcast transmission, and a non-transmission key 45 for giving an instruction not to transmit image data of a predetermined area. While the Fukushima reference clearly teaches all of the pertinent steps of the claimed invention, and we agree with the examiner that the “prescribed sequence of actions in Fukushima is 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007