Ex Parte GELLER et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2002-2083                                                                                                   
               Application No. 09/430,642                                                                                             


                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                   
                       Appellants’ invention relates to high performance embedded RF filters.  An                                     
               understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 9,                                     
               which is reproduced below.                                                                                             
                       9.      An embedded coupled shaped dielectric waveguide resonator                                              
                       comprising                                                                                                     
                               a metal support substrate,                                                                             
                               a first green tape stack adhered to the support substrate,                                             
                               cavity openings in the first green tape stack to provide walls and                                     
                       coupling apertures in the green tape stack,                                                                    
                               a conductive layer over said first green tape stack, and                                               
                               a second green tape stack mounted on said conductive layer.                                            
                       The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                
               appealed claims are:                                                                                                   

               Piloto et al. (Piloto)                  5,382,931                      Jan. 17, 1995                                   
               Kubota et al. (Kubota)                  6,137,384                      Oct. 24, 2000                                   
                                                                              (Filed Feb. 19, 1999)                                   
                       Claims 6, 8, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                                
               Piloto.  Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                     
               Piloto.  Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                      
               Piloto in view of Kubota.                                                                                              


                                                                 2                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007