The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RYUTA TANAKA
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-2100
Application No. 09/042,334
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, and 11. Claims 3-5, 7, 9, and 12 have
been indicated by the Examiner to be allowable subject to being
rewritten in independent form. An amendment filed June 14, 2001
after final rejection was approved for entry by the Examiner.
The claimed invention relates to a system and method for
storing data in which a processor controls an access schedule for
storing redundant data on a redundant data disk. According to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007