Appeal No. 2002-2100
Application No. 09/042,334
(CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968), reh’g denied,
390 U.S. 1000 (1968). Accordingly, since all of the claim
limitations are not present in the disclosure of Wilkes, we do
not sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of
appealed claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, and 11. Therefore, the decision
of the Examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, and 11 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR/hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007