The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI NISHIYAMA, YOSHIKAZU SAITO, AKIYOSHI TOMITA,
KATSUTOSHI NAKAJIMA, AKIRA NORIZUKI and KAZUYOSHI UNNO
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2151
Application No. 09/342,234
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 10, all of the claims pending in
this application.
Appellants' invention relates to an improvement for a
vehicle network system and a method of controlling states of
vehicle apparatuses in which plural slave apparatuses and a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007