Ex Parte SMITH - Page 2



              Appeal No. 2002-2209                                                               Page 2                
              Application No. 08/137,168                                                                               

                     (d)  pooling said blood from each host; and                                                       
                     (e)  obtaining the IgG, F(ab0)2 fragment, or Fab fragment populations from said                   
              pool of blood.                                                                                           
                     Claim 39 is representative of the allowed claims and reads as follows:                            
                     39.  An isolated snake antivenom comprising a mixture of four different                           
              monospecific IgG, F(ab0)2 fragment, or Fab fragment populations each of which is                         
              obtained from different ovine antisera, wherein each of said antisera is separately raised               
              to a different snake venom, and wherein said snake venom is selected from a group                        
              consisting of A. piscivorus, C. adamanteus, C. atrox, and C. scutulatus.                                 
                     The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                   
              Carroll                     5,196,193                   Mar. 23, 1993                                    
              Russell et al. (Russell), “Preparation of a New Antivenin by Affinity Chromatography,”                   
              American J. Trop. Med. Hyg., Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 141-150 (1985)                                          
              Berkow et al. (Berkow), “Venomous Bites and Stings,” The Merck Manual, Ch. 290, pp.                      
              2565-2571 (15th ed., Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 1987)                                                 
              Goding et al. (Goding), “Generation of Conventional Antibodies,” Monoclonal                              
              Antibodies: Principles and Practice, Ch. 8, pp. 250-261 (Academic Press Inc., Orlando,                   
              FL 1983)                                                                                                 
              Dos Santos et al. (Dos Santos), “Purification of F(ab0)2 Anti-Snake Venom by Caprylic                    
              Acid: A Fast Method for Obtaining IgG Fragments With High Neutralization Activity,                       
              Purity and Yield,” Toxicon, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 297-303 (1989)                                           
                     References relied upon by appellant are:                                                          
              Theakston et al. (Theakston), “Therapeutic Antibodies to Snake Venoms,” Therapeutic                      
              Antibodies, Ch. 6, pp. 109-133 (Springer-Verlag London Limited 1995)                                     
              Christensen, “The Preparation and Purification of Antivenoms,” Mem. Inst. Butantan                       
              Simp. Internc., Vol. 33, No. 2, 245-250 (1966)                                                           
                     Claims 23, 25 through 30, 32 through 38, and 42 through 44 stand rejected under                   
              35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Carroll,                       
              Russell, and Berkow.  Claims 24 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007