Appeal No. 2002-2304 Application No. 09/419,157 Page 7 emitting coherently, and (answer, page 10) that the fact that Zhu does no disclose this basic wave phenomena does not preclude the phenomena from occurring. Appellants respond (reply brief, page 2) that the examiner provides no evidence that Zhu has "coherent" electromagnetic radiation. It is argued (id.) that if, as the examiner maintains, electromagnetic energy attenuation is inherent in any and every spacing of connectors, then the mother and daughter boards described in appellants' background presumably would not have cans or fences. Appellants further argue (id.) that the connectors of Zhu that the examiner is relying upon are in fact used to transfer signals between daughter boards and the mother board, and that the examiner must provide some evidence that the connectors that transfer information as signals also attenuate unwanted signals. It is further argued (id.) that Zhu discloses no more than a conventional mother board and daughter board configuration, and that (reply brief, pages 2 and 3) the examiner has no basis for suggesting that Zhu inherently discloses “‘electrical connector spaced to attenuate . . . electromagnetic energy’ since the only connectors disclosed by Zhu are edge card connectors that carry information signals. The written description makes clear that the edge card connectors disclosedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007