The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte AMANDA ELIZABETH CHESSELL,
MARTIN MULHOLLAND, and KATHRYN SARAH WARR
__________
Appeal No. 2002-2322
Application 09/094,314
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21, which constitute
all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to the field of
transaction processing. More particularly, the invention seeks
to avoid the creation of a transaction coordinator until such
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007