Appeal No. 2002-2327
Application No. 09/142,549
In summary, since we are of the opinion that the prior art
applied by the Examiner does not support the obviousness
rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of independent claims
1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, nor of claims 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 11 dependent
thereon. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007