Ex Parte Wilk - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0101                                                        
          Application No. 09/661,520                                                  

          his/her ear, expecting to hear the sound of the ocean, in                   
          accordance with lore, what is heard is a digitally encoded                  
          artificial sound which could be, for example, the roar of a lion,           
          or a recorded spoken message such as, “Get your ear out of my               
          house.”                                                                     

               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.  A novelty or entertainment device comprising:                      
               a housing in the form of a sea shell;                                  
               a sound reproduction system mounted to said housing so as to           
          remain hidden from casual visual inspection of said housing; and            
               a switch mounted to said housing and operatively connected             
          to said sound reproduction system for activating same after and             
          only after a lifting of said housing to an ear of a user.                   
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Curran                        4,923,428         May 08, 1990                
          Saitoh                        5,316,516         May 31, 1994                
               Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                  
          evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Saitoh with regard             
          to claims 1-5, 7-12 and 14-16, adding Curran with regard to                 
          claims 6, 13, 17 and 18.                                                    
               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                         
                                         -2–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007