The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte EIMAR M. BOESJES ______________ Appeal No. 2003-0108 Application No. 09/123,778 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 55 through 78. The disclosed invention relates to a central storage area for digitally transferable goods from multiple providers, and to the download of purchased digital goods from the central storage area to a shopper. Claim 55 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007