Appeal No. 2003-0108 Application No. 09/123,778 The examiner contends (answer, page 8) that the entries in the configuration file in Chen (column 13, lines 39 through 42) “are analogous to the ‘inventory of digitally transferable goods’” in the claimed storage and distribution region. Chen clearly explains (column 3, lines 39 through 44) that the configuration files 250 and 350 are for “storing specifications on accessing the information that is available through the information distribution system from the plurality of information suppliers 10, 20, 30.” Chen further explains (column 10, lines 17 through 23) that “[r]egardless of whether the configuration files 250, 350 reside locally in the memory of customer terminal 50, or are stored centrally in a central catalog system 60, any further processing requires interaction between the customer terminal 50 and the supplier terminal 15, 25, 35 of the information supplier 10, 20, 30 that provides the selected information item.” In other words, “the supplier terminal 15 will transmit the selected information item to customer terminal 50” (column 12, lines 2 through 4). Thus, the referenced portion of Chen1 is directed to the cataloging of 1 We note in passing that the admitted prior art in Chen (column 1, lines 32 through 55) discloses a computerized bulletin board system (BBS) that includes a listing of information as well 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007