Ex Parte LUCIDARME - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2003-0191                                                        
          Application 09/155,278                                                      


          energy entering any one port being transferred, usually equally,            
          to two of the three remaining ports.2  A duplexer, in radar                 
          systems, is a device that isolates a receiver from a transmitter            
          while permitting them to share the same antenna.2  In response to           
          the appellant’s argument that a duplexer is not a hybrid                    
          polarization coupler (brief, page 4), the examiner argues that              
          “the duplexer of Runyon is a device designed to allow an antenna            
          to be used for both transmission and reception of signals                   
          simultaneously.  A coupling is a means by which energy is                   
          transferred from one conductive or dielectric medium (optical               
          waveguide) to another, including fortuitous occurrences.  Since             
          hybrid coupler is defined as a hybrid junction that forms a                 
          directional coupler, it is considered that couplers 80 and 82 act           
          as a type of first and second hybrid transmission polarization              
          couplers” (answer, pages 6-7).                                              
               Runyon’s items 80 and 82, however, are not couplers but,               
          rather, are duplexers.  Runyon’s discussion of his duplexers 80             
          and 82 is consistent with the definition of “duplexer” set forth            
          above.  That is, Runyon discloses that 1) duplexers 80 and 82               


               2 Definitions of “hybrid coupler”, “hybrid junction”,                  
          “directional coupler” and “duplexer” are set forth in the                   
          appellant’s reply brief (page 2).                                           
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007