Appeal No. 2003-0319 Application No. 09/206,663 Page 2 from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows: 1. A computer-implemented real-time decision support system comprising: means for receiving complex queries posed by a plurality of users; means for providing for each of the queries an executable query process furnishing a result when data sources satisfy constraints of the query; means for providing data sources, the data sources including an event source; means for responding to an event furnished by an event source to initiate execution of all query processes having constraints satisfied by data sources; and means for furnishing results of executed query processes to users. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Risberg et al. (Risberg) 5,339,392 Aug. 16, 1994 Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Risberg. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 16, mailed August 14, 2002) for the examiner's complete reasoning in supportPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007