Appeal No. 2003-0319
Application No. 09/206,663 Page 8
Risberg does not disclose "means for responding to an event to
initiate execution of all query processes having constraints
satisfied by data sources" since Risberg does not respond to an
event by initiating execution of all query processes having
constraints satisfied by data sources, as recited in claim 1.
From all of the above, we find that the examiner has failed
to establish a prima facie case of anticipation of claim 1. The
rejection of claim 1 and claims 2-10, dependent therefrom, is
therefore reversed. In addition, as independent claim 11
similarly recites "receiving complex queries" and "responding to
events by executing all query processes having constraints
satisfied by data sources to provide results required by each of
the queries," we find that Risberg does not anticipate
independent claim 11. Accordingly, the rejection of claim 11,
and claims 12-20, dependent therefrom, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims
1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.
REVERSED
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007