Ex Parte MASSINGILL et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                            Paper No. 21             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                      Ex parte LARRY WILLIAM MASSINGILL, TORBJORN WILSON SOLVE,                                      
                     RICHARD E. WEISS, YI-PIN ERIC WANG, and KUMAR BALACHANDRAN                                      
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2003-0506                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/264,766                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before BARRETT, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1-45.  The appellants appeal therefrom under                   
             35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm.                                                                         


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention at issue on appeal concerns radiotelephone satellite                               
             communications ("SATCOM").  (Spec. at 1.)  A radiotelephone SATCOM system                               
             provides communications to and from mobile user terminals by establishing                               
             radiotelephone communications links with the terminals.  (Id. at 12-13.)  For example, a                
             link may be established for a call placed by a telephone coupled to a public switched                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007