Ex Parte VRIJER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0511                                                        
          Application No. 09/350,448                                                  


          balloon having a stent crimped therearound and a filling body of            
          elastic and radiopaque material arranged inside the balloon where           
          the filling body is compressed by the stent when the stent is in            
          a compressed state.  Further details of this appealed subject               
          matter are set forth in representative independent claim 1 which            
          reads as follows:                                                           
          1.  A stent delivery system with a balloon catheter for                     
          positioning a stent, comprising:                                            
               a tubular shaft with a proximal end and a distal end, and at           
          least one lumen extending in between,                                       
               an inelastic balloon near the distal end of the shaft which            
          is connected with the lumen,                                                
               a stent crimped around the balloon; and a filling body of              
          elastic and radiopaque material arranged inside the balloon and             
          affixed to the shaft, the filling body having a size                        
          corresponding to at least a dimension of the stent in a                     
          compressed state, where the filling body is compressed by the               
          stent when the stent is in a compressed state.                              
               The reference set forth is relied upon by the examiner as              
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Dusbabek et al. (Dusbabek) WO 98/07390     Feb. 26, 1998                    
          (published World Intell. Prop. Org. Application)                            
               All of the appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dusbabek.  The examiner                 
          acknowledges that Dusbabek does not teach a stent delivery system           
          wherein the mounting body (which corresponds to the here-claimed            

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007