Ex Parte JIN et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 34              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                Ex parte RAYMOND R. JIN, SHIJIAN LI, FRED C. REDEKER                  
                               and THOMAS H. OSTERHELD                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0512                                  
                               Application 09/184,805                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before ABRAMS, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-21 and 29, all the claims currently pending           
          in the application.                                                         
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a method of chemical                 
          mechanical polishing a substrate having a filler layer and a stop           
          layer.  Independent claim 1 is exemplary of the appealed subject            
          matter and reads as follows:                                                
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007