The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CRIS T. PALTENGHE, ALNOOR B. MAMDANI, CHARLES GOLVIN, HENRY LICHSTEIN, DAVID SOLO, JACK PAN and MELVIN M. TAKATA ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0755 Application No. 09/190,993 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 14-24, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. Claims 1-13 have been canceled. An amendment filed May 8, 2002 after final rejection was approved for entry by the Examiner. The disclosed invention relates to a virtual wallet system which includes a locally residing portion and a remotely residing server portion. The virtual wallet system interacts with thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007