Appeal No. 2003-0843 Page 2 Application No. 09/198,728 BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to methods and apparatus for designing packet-based networks, and more particularly, for designing IP (Internet Protocol) networks with performance guarantees (specification, page 1). An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows: 1. A processor-based method for designing a packet-based communications network, comprising the steps of: augmenting an initial network topology containing links and associated capacities with one of additional links and capacities; and repeating the augmenting step until flow demands associated with at least one connection can be routed in the packet-based communications network. No prior art references have been relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims. Claims 1-42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, as being non-enabled. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 13, mailed May 21, 2002) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants' brief (Paper No. 12, filedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007