The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM CRAIG RAPP
and KRISTIANN JOY SCHULTZ
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0873
Application No. 08/896,245
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, SAADAT, LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 3-5, 8, 11-13, 15, 17, 18,
20, 26-28, and 30, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
BACKGROUND
Appellants' invention relates to an apparatus and method to
provide persistence for application interfaces. Specifically, a
persistent CGI model is used to provide a CGI program extent.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007