Appeal No. 2003-0873 Application No. 08/896,245 Page 7 appears to be an integral construct of Smith (brief, page 9-10). Additionally, appellants assert that Smith teaches away from a persistent CGI process because it clearly discloses multiple instances of a transient CGI program (brief, page 10-11). From our review of Smith, we find that the reference relates to an Internet communication system wherein a client establishes a first connection to a server whereby a session server generates and conveys session data to the requesting client; the session server maintains this previously conveyed session data after termination of the first connection to reconvey it to the client who establishes a second connection in order to reduce or eliminate the need for redundant information retrieval (col 1, line 49 to col. 2, line 26). Upon establishing the initial connection with the server, the client is assigned a unique session identifier used to identify the client during subsequent connections (col. 5, line 67 to col. 6, line 6). Client (12) may establish an unlimited number of connections with the session server (24) and a new CGI may handle communications during each new connection (col. 9, lines 52-55). More specifically, Smith discloses (col. 14, lines 43-46) that: If client 12 establishes another connection with session server 24 within the first specified time interval,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007