The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARION SCOTT BRIGHT, PUSHPALATHA CHANNIKERE,
BALASUBRAMANIAN GOPALAN, RAHUL JINDANI, JINRAJ DHRUVAKUMAR
JOSHIPURA, VINOD KANNOTH, JAYAKUMAR KRISHNAMURTHY, GREGORY LEE
MCKEE, SYLVAIN MICHEL, PENNY JEANNETTE PEACHEY-KOUNTZ
and JAMES DONALD SCOTT
________________
Appeal No. 2003-0901
Application 09/303,368
________________
HEARD: JULY 14, 2004
________________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11 and
13-24, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007