Ex Parte BRIGHT et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0901                                                        
          Application 09/303,368                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for pre-processing electronic sales order data before             
          it is transmitted to an order processing system.                            
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   A system for pre-processing orders before they are                
          transmitted to an order processing system, comprising:                      
               an order interceptor receiving and pre-processing electronic           
          sales order data prior to transmitting to the order processing              
          system;                                                                     
               an interface system receiving the electronic sales order               
          data from the order interceptor and performing an availability              
          check, wherein the availability check determines the portions of            
          the electronic sales order data that can be satisfied; and                  
               means for transmitting at least a portion of the electronic            
          sales order data to the order processing system for order                   
          processing.                                                                 
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Johnson et al. (Johnson)      6,023,683          Feb. 08, 2000              
          (filed Aug. 10, 1994)                                                       
          Blinn et al. (Blinn)          6,058,373          May  02, 2000              
          (filed Oct. 16, 1996)                                                       
          Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13-24 stand rejected                        
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness the                   
          examiner offers Blinn taken alone or Johnson taken alone.                   
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007