Ex Parte CHEONG et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-0902                                                        
          Application No. 09/332,413                                                  

               selectively dispatching instructions from said group of                
          instructions up to and including said interruptible instruction             
          of said selected type, in response to finding an interruptible              
          instruction of said selected type in said group of N fetched                
          instructions, wherein if an instruction group contains an                   
          interruptible instruction of a selected type, only one                      
          interruptible instruction of said selected type is included in              
          said instruction group;                                                     
               recording a state for the processor associated with a                  
          dispatchd instruction group; and                                            
               restoring said processor to said recorded state associated             
          with said dispatched instruction group containing said                      
          interruptible instruction of said selected type causing an                  
          interrupt, in response to said interrupt from one of said                   
          interruptible insructions of said selected type.                            
                                     References                                       
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
          Peleg et al (Peleg)           5,381,533           Jan. 10, 1995             
          Shen et al (Shen)             5,649,136           Jul. 15, 1997             
          Blandy et al (Blandy)         5,940,618      Aug. 17, 1999                  
                                 Rejections At Issue                                  
               Claims 5, 6, 14, 15, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103 as being obvious over the combination of Shen and Peleg.              
               Claims 3, 9, 12, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being obvious over the combination of Shen and Peleg and           
          Blandy.                                                                     





                                          3                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007