The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 42 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FRANKLIN C. BRESLAU, PAUL G. GREENSTEIN and JOHN T. RODELL ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0994 Application No. 08/579,544 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 16-22 and 38-63. Claims 1-15 and 23-37 have been canceled. Invention Appellants' invention relates to object-oriented computer systems. More specifically, to managing instances of objects by migrating an object between a merged status having a single instance and a split status having multiple instances. An object invoker invokes the object in the same way regardless of itsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007