Appeal No. 2003-0994 Application No. 08/579,544 instances of an object" [answer, page 9]. The Corradi reference in combination with the Travis and Huang fails to cure the deficiencies of Travis and Huang noted above with respect to claim 16. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) for the same reasons as set forth above. Conclusion In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 16-22 and 38-63. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ALLEN R. MACDONALD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007