Appeal No.2003-1091
Application No. 09/484,248
Lantech Inc., 807 F.2d 970, 973 n.*, 1 USPQ2d 1202, 1204 n.*
(Fed. Cir. 1986).
In summary, with respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) rejection, we have sustained the rejection of claim 1,
but have not sustained the rejection of claim 14. We have also
sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims
2-13 and 18-20, but have not sustained the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
rejection of claims 15-17. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 1-20 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
James D. Thomas )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Joseph F. Ruggiero )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Stuart S. Levy )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR/eld
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007