The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEFAN UHLENBROCK
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1162
Application No. 09/468,292
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Claims 1-28 and 33-72 are currently pending in the Application. Of these, the Examiner
rejects claims 1-9, 20-24, 33-39, and 44-72, whereas the other claims are indicated as allowed or
allowable if written in independent form (Answer, p. 2). We have jurisdiction over the appeal
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007