THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TOSHINORI TANAKA, KYOUHEI YAMAMOTO,
AKIHIRO DAIKOKU, AKIHIKO IMAGI,
YOSHIO YOSHIKUWA and MITSUYUKI TSUMURA
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-1188
Application 09/987,374
______________
HEARD: 20 November 2003
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-5. Claims 6-10 stand withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as the result of a restriction requirement.
The disclosed invention pertains to an armature for a dynamo-electric machine
that prevents the occurrence of unbalanced currents flowing through brushes which
supply an electric current to coils of the armature.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007