Ex Parte Tanaka et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2003-1188                                                                                               
               Application No. 09/987,374                                                                                         


                      Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                            
                      1.  An armature for a dynamo-electric machine comprising:                                                   
                              a shaft;                                                                                            
                              a core, secured to said shaft, having a plurality of slots extending in an                          
               axial direction formed on an outer circumferential surface of said core;                                           
                              a coil comprising a plurality of coil portions formed by simultaneously                             
               winding wires a plurality of turns around a pair of said slots separated by a                                      
               predetermined number of said slots and offsetting each of said coil portions in the                                
               circumferential direction of said core, wherein at least one pair of adjacent coil portions                        
               share a common one of said slots;                                                                                  
                              a commutator secured to said shaft, said commutator comprising a                                    
               plurality of segments; and                                                                                         
                              a plurality of equalizing connectors for permanently electrically connecting                        
               pairs of said segments that should have the same electric potential, so that each of                               
               pairs of said coil portions that should have the same electric potential has a                                     
               substantially equal electrical potential.                                                                          
                      The examiner relies on the following references:                                                            
               Baldwin                2,632,125           Mar. 17, 1953                                                           
               Aoki                      4,532,449          Jul.   30, 1985                                                       
               Rabe                    4,635,349          Jan.  13, 1987                                                          
                      Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of                                         
               obviousness the examiner offers Aoki in view of Baldwin with respect to claim 1, and                               
               Rabe is added to this combination with respect to claims 2-5.                                                      
                      Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make                                     
               reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                         
                                                           OPINION                                                                
                                                                2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007