Ex Parte BACHA et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-1225                                                                                         
              Application No. 09/223,765                                                                                   

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The invention is directed to a vault controller that manages resources in a secure                    
              environment (e.g., in an electronic business system).  Vaults are personalized storage                       
              areas on a disk to which only the owner has access, using a vault access certificate.                        
              Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                                                 
                     1.     In an electronic business system, a vault controller supervisor managing                       
                     the interaction in a secure manner using PKI between end users and applications                       
                     running in the system, comprising:                                                                    
                            a)      a web server; and                                                                      
                            b)      a shared object library coupled to the server and including a                          
                                    supervisor performing vsSupervisor Initialize and vsSupervisor                         
                                    Service functions for handling user independent, multi-threaded,                       
                                    persistent and stateful vault processes running in a secure                            
                                    environment linked to the user.                                                        
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                      
              Carroll                             6,105,131                           Aug. 15, 2000                        
                                                                               (filed Nov. 26, 1997)                       
                     Claims 1-4, 7, and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated                        
              by Carroll.                                                                                                  
                     Claims 9-12 and 20-24 stand allowed.  The examiner has withdrawn the rejection                        
              of claims 5, 6, and 13-19.                                                                                   
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 9) and the Examiner’s Answer (Paper                        
              No. 16) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 15) for                       
              appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                                        

                                                            -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007