Ex Parte JOHNSON - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1410                                                        
          Application 09/272,056                                                      


                    Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                       
                    1.  A computer-implemented draft authentication method            
          for use in e-commerce, comprising the steps of:                             
                    storing, for each of a plurality of draft drawers, at             
          least one piece of unique identifying information, said at least            
          one piece of unique identifying information being linked at least           
          to said respective drawer’s financial information;                          
                    authenticating a drawer of a draft by immediately                 
          encrypting at least a portion of an identification data provided            
          by the drawer and successfully matching the immediately encrypted           
          identification data with said at least one stored piece of                  
          identifying information;                                                    
                    retrieving at least the drawer’s financial information            
          and establishing constraints based on the retrieved financial               
          information;                                                                
                    honoring a draft presented by a payee with whom the               
          drawee has a partner relationship only when the drawer of the               
          presented draft is successfully authenticated by drawee and the             
          constraints are satisfied.                                                  
                    The following reference is relied on by the examiner:             
          Sixtus                  5,903,721                 May  11, 1999             
          (filed Mar. 13, 1997)                                                       

                    Claims 1 through 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Sixtus.                                    
                    Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant,                
          reference is made to the Brief and Reply Brief for appellant’s              
          positions and to the Answer for the examiner’s positions.                   

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007