Appeal No. 2003-1410
Application 09/272,056
Therefore, on the basis of the weight of the arguments
and the lack of evidence persuading us of the anticipatory nature
of Sixtus as to each of the respective independent claims 1, 15,
26 and 38 on appeal, we reverse the rejection of all of these
claims and their respective dependent claims under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102. As such, the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JDT:psb
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007