Ex Parte Reeves et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and 
                                              is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   
                                                                                               Paper No. 13            
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                  Ex parte RICHARD A. REEVES, ROBERT A. WOLF,                                          
                                                  and PAUL I. CHANG                                                    
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                  Appeal No. 2003-1416                                                 
                                               Application No. 09/819,549                                              
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
             Before WINTERS, TIMM, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
             TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This appeal involves claims 14-24, which are all the claims pending in the application.            
             We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                         















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007