Appeal No. 2003-1469 Page 12 Application No. 08/479,886 imposed in the restriction requirement. Where that line is crossed the prohibition of the third sentence of [35 U.S.C. §] 121 does not apply.” Gerber Garment Technology Inc. v. Lectra Systems Inc., 916 F.2d 683, 688, 16 USPQ2d 1436, 1440 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Summary The examiner has not established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that practicing the full scope of the claimed invention would have required undue experimentation. The rejection for nonenablement is therefore reversed. REVERSED Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EG/jlbPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007