The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication in a law journal and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL A. WARD, MARK L. REINKE and HENRY M. D'SOUZA
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-1482
Application No. 09/156,816
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, BLANKENSHIP and NAPPI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6-11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19-21, 23, 24, 26, 27
and 29-41.
The Invention
The invention relates to a system to use a variable resolution display
controller with a video display of fixed resolution. The system determines the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007