Appeal No. 2003-1482 Application No. 09/156,816 Accordingly we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6-11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19-21, 23, 24, 26, 27, and 29-41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kesatoshi in view of Reddy. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ROBERT E. NAPPI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) REN/vsh 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007