The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CARL PHILLIP GUSLER, RICK A. HAMILTON, II, and STEPHANIE E. WOODS ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1515 Application No. 09/364,014 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, GROSS and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-30, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to a method and system for providing standardized methodology for assessing a system’s health and making appropriate recommendation. According to Appellants, depending on the type of the performed test and thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007