Appeal No. 2003-1545
Application 09/292,499
point in the first region into a corresponding point in the
second region.
Thus, while the combination of Irani and Wixson may
recognize the need for warp transformation parameters, the
combination fails to teach how such warp transformation
parameters are defined, whereas, in the instant claimed
invention, the definition of the warp transformation parameters
comes from the operator identified first and second regions.
While Irani may teach an alignment of video frames and that
information is necessary for such alignment, Irani does not
suggest that operator identified corresponding regions are used
in the alignment. Accordingly, the combination of Irani and
Wixson does not suggest the instant claimed subject matter.
We also do not find the reference to Gu helpful, with regard
to claims 17-23, in supplying the deficiencies of the primary
references.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007