Ex Parte BRILL et al - Page 9

          Appeal No. 2003-1545                                                        
          Application 09/292,499                                                      


               For at least these reasons, we will not sustain the                    
          rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 7 and 13-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.              
               The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                   
                                        REVERSED                                      





                         ERROL A. KRASS                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         JERRY SMITH                   )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )  APPEALS AND                 
                                                      )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         LEE E. BARRETT                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              



          EAK/ki                                                                      










                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007