The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHAH MOHAMMED REZAUL ISLAM, VIKRAM HARAKERE
KRISHNAMURTHY, and PRASENJIT SARKAR
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1603
Application No. 09/376,832
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 6 through 8. Claims 1 through 5 and 12
through 16 have been indicated as being allowed, and claims 9
through 11 have been objected to as being dependent upon rejected
base claims.
Appellants' invention relates to a computer system with
plural storage volumes wherein a snapshot module invokes a
snapshot relationship between the volumes such that read and
write requests can be made to any volumes in the relationship.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007