Appeal No. 2003-1603
Application No. 09/376,832
The portion referenced by appellants does suggest that write
updates cannot be made to the source volume. However, as pointed
out by the examiner, the claim language merely requires that
either read or write be able to occur. Appellants have not shown
why read requests cannot be made to any volume. Accordingly, we
will sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 6 through 8.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 6 through 8
under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 is affirmed.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007