Appeal No. 2003-1614 Page 13
Application No. 09/817,692
we are unpersuaded of a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the
obviousness rejection of claims 10-12, 21 and 22, and 18-20; which respectively
depend from claims 7, 13, and 15.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-6 under § 101 is reversed. The rejection of
claims 7, 13, and 15 under § 102(e) and the rejection of claims 10-12 and 18-22 under
§ 103(a) are also reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007