The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JOHN ANTHONY BEAVEN, AMANDA ELIZABETH CHESSELL, CATHERINE GRIFFIN, IAIN STUART CALDWELL HOUSTON, MARTIN MULHOLLAND, IAN ROBINSON and DAVID JOHN VINES __________ Appeal No. 2003-1619 Application No. 09/442,888 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, SAADAT, and NAPPI Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-13, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention relates to data processing in a complex component-based business environment whereinPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007